faculty

Publications

Secondary Prevention Medications in 17 Countries Grouped by Income Level (PURE): A Prospective Cohort Study.

Groups and Associations Joseph, Philip; Avezum, Álvaro; Ramasundarahettige, Chinthanie; Mony, Prem K.; Yusuf, Rita; Kazmi, Khawar; Szuba, Andrzej; Lopez-Jaramillo, Patricio; Diaz, Maria Luz; Yusufali, Afzal Hussein; Gulec, Sadi; Kelishadi, Roya; Wei, Li; Chifamba, Jephat; Lanas, Fernando; Puoane, Thandi; Krishnapillai, Ambigga; Rangarajan, Sumathy; Yusuf, Salim
Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2025

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether global use of medications for secondary cardiovascular (CVD) prevention is improving over time. OBJECTIVES: This study  across 17 high-, middle- and low-income countries described variations in  secondary CVD prevention medication use over a median follow-up of 12 years.  METHODS: In the multinational PURE (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology) cohort  study, we conducted a repeated cross-sectional analysis to examine temporal  variations in the use of secondary prevention medications in participants with  CVD. In participants with coronary artery disease, we focused on antiplatelet  agents, statins, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors, and β-blockers. In  participants with stroke, we focused on antiplatelet agents, statins, RAS  inhibitors, and other blood pressure-lowering drugs. Medications were collected  at baseline and on 4 subsequent follow-up visits. RESULTS: The analysis included  7,409 participants with a diagnosis of CVD at the baseline visit, 8,792 at the  second visit, 9,236 at the third visit, 11,082 at the fourth visit, and 11,677 at  the last visit. The median age at baseline was 58.0 years, and 52.9% of the  participants were female. The median follow-up was 12 years, with the median year  of the baseline visit in 2007 and the fifth visit in 2019. Over this period, use  of 1 or more classes of medications for secondary CVD prevention was 41.3%  (95% CI: 40.2%-42.4%) at baseline, peaked at 43.1% (95% CI: 42.0%-44.1%), and  then decreased to 31.3% (95% CI: 30.4%-32.1%) by the last study visit. In  high-income countries, this use decreased from 88.8% (95% CI: 86.6%-91.0%) to  77.3% (95% CI: 74.9%-79.6%). In upper-middle-income countries, this use increased  from 55.0% (95% CI: 52.8%-57.3%) to 61.1% (95% CI: 59.1%-63.1%). In  lower-middle-income countries, use of at least 1 class of medications was 29.5%  (95% CI: 28.1%-30.9%) at baseline, peaked at 31.7% (95% CI: 30.4%-33.1%), and  then decreased to 13.4% (95% CI: 12.5%-14.2%) by the last visit. In low-income  countries, use of at least 1 class of medications was 20.8% (95% CI: 18.1%-23.5%)  at baseline, peaked at 47.3% (95% CI: 44.8%-49.9%), and then decreased to 27.5%  (95% CI: 25.2%-29.9%) by the last study visit. CONCLUSIONS: Globally and in most  country income-level groups, the use of medications for secondary CVD prevention  has been low, with little improvement over time.