3. “A Comparison in refractive outcome between pterygium excision with conjunctival auto graft and sub - conjunctival pterygium excision with reposition of conjunctiva using autologous blood
Aim: To evaluate the change in keratometric reading and cylindrical power in the immediate post-operative period and at the end of one month in the two groups evaluated. [ group 1 – subconjunctival excision of pterygium with reposition of conjunctiva using autologous blood, group 2- pterygium excision with limbal conjunctival auto graft using 10-0 ethilon sutures.] Method: The study involved 22 patients in group 1 and 19 patients in group 2. All the patients in group 1 were operated by surgeon 1 and group 2 patients were operated by surgeon 2. The keratometric reading was documented pre- operatively, on the rst post- operative day and at the end of one month in all the patients. The patients were followed up for a period of 9 months. The data was analysed using Two Way Annova and repeated measures Annova test. Univariate analysis was done using student's test and paired t test. Multivariate analysis was done using repeated measures ANOVA. Result: The mean (+SD) age of the study patients was 45.09 (+9.86) years. There was female preponderance with 29 females and 12 males. The two groups were well matched with no statistically signicant difference in the age, gender, baseline cylindrical power and keratometric reading in the two principal meridia of the two groups. There was a statistically signicant reduction in the cylindrical power of the eyes across the whole follow-up period across the groups (p<0,001). nd There was also a signicant reduction from baseline to rst follow-up at the end of 1week (p=0,002), baseline to 2 follow-up at 1month (p<0.001) st nd and between 1 and 2 follow-up (p=0.004), Table 2. Change in cylinder across study period was very signicant with F value 25.8 and p value<0.001. There was statistically signicant change in the Keratometric readings of both the principal meridian, with the change in Keratometric readings greater in the horizontal meridian than the vertical meridian, (p<0.001 and p=0.03 respectively. First post-operative visit cylinder value (C2) between the groups was very signicant with t-5.7 and p value<0.001. Second post-operative visit (C3) between the groups was signicant with t 2.2 and p value 0.03. Conclusion : Patients who underwent subconjunctival dissection and excision of pterygium with conjunctival reposition using autologous blood had a stable k reading within the rst post op day as compared to patients who underwent pterygium excision with limbal autograft transplantation. At the end of one month both the groups had a similar stabilisation of the keratometric readings.